European leaders described the Ukraine crisis as an ‘existential challenge’ for the EU.

As the United States is scaling back its security commitments to Europe, transatlantic ties are fraying. Amid mounting concerns, European Union leaders convened a special summit on Thursday to discuss strengthening Europe’s defense and its support for Ukraine.

RELATED:

Greenland Elections To Take Place Under Trump’s Shadow

REARM EUROPE PLAN APPROVED

At the one-day summit, the leaders endorsed the ReArm Europe plan introduced by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, marking the EU’s significant step toward greater defense autonomy amid shifting transatlantic ties.

The post-summit statement described the Ukraine crisis as an “existential challenge” for the EU, urging Europe to assume greater responsibility for its defense.

The EU leaders agreed to activate the national escape clause under the Stability and Growth Pact in a coordinated manner, which allows for increased defense spending and provides immediate budgetary flexibility across member states.

Von der Leyen formally introduced her 800-billion-euro (US$869 billion) plan on Tuesday to significantly increase defense spending across the bloc. The plan establishes a 150-billion-euro (US$163 billion) loan program to help EU countries jointly invest in critical military assets.

The leaders acknowledged the loan program, and urged the decision-making European Council to “examine this proposal as a matter of urgency,” according to the statement.

SIGNIFICANT OBSTACLES REMAIN

Despite the joint statement, some EU leaders voiced concern over the plan. POLITICO Europe reported that Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni was worried about the impact the loans could have on the market’s perception of Italy’s debt.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban wrote on social media platform X that while he supports strengthening Europe’s defense capabilities, such efforts should empower member states rather than Brussels bureaucrats.

Jian Junbo, deputy director of the Center for China-Europe Relations at Shanghai-based Fudan University, cautioned that despite the agreement, significant obstacles remain in executing the plan.

He believes that key questions remain unresolved, such as whether member states are willing to bear the financial burden and how funds will be allocated. Further uncertainties include coordination with NATO and balancing European defense ambitions with U.S. strategic interests.

“This is not just a numbers game, it’s a fundamental decision about the future direction of EU defense strategy, requiring further negotiation and coordination,” Jian said.

DIVISIONS PERSIST ON UKRAINE

On Thursday, Orban opted out in a statement on Ukraine, highlighting divisions within the bloc. The leaders but Orban approved the bloc’s stance that there can be no negotiations on Ukraine without Ukraine and that Europe must be involved in any talks involving its security. Recently, the EU has found itself sidelined in peace talks over Ukraine, with the United States taking the lead.

Commenting on Hungary’s stance, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said that the EU seeks unity among all 27 member states on Ukraine. “If that’s not possible, then Hungary can speak for itself,” she said.

The debate on deploying a European peacekeeping force to Ukraine saw little progress. Meloni dismissed the idea as “the least effective option,” arguing that Ukraine’s most stable and lasting security guarantee will be bringing it under NATO’s Article 5, which treats an attack on Ukraine as an attack on all NATO members.

LIMITED DEFENSE AUTONOMY?

Analysts say Europe has intensified efforts toward defense and strategic autonomy in response to Washington’s abrupt policy shift toward its transatlantic allies. However, given its profound reliance on the United States, Europe may only achieve “limited autonomy” in defense.

Yang Cheng, executive dean of the Shanghai Academy of Global Governance and Area Studies, noted that post-World War II European security has been fundamentally based on U.S. protection.

However, it seems that the United States under the current administration sees limited value in offering such public goods for free. Yang noted that by exploiting Europe’s deep-rooted Russophobia, Washington can advance its strategic goals while reducing the costs of sustaining its waning global supremacy.

Ding Chun, director of the Center for European Studies at Fudan University, said Europe faces key hurdles as it seeks security structures beyond NATO.

Europe remains reliant on the United States geopolitically, militarily, economically and ideologically, Ding said. Given these constraints, he argued that “limited autonomy” may be Europe’s only feasible defense path going forward.

Ding expects the EU to reduce reliance on the United States in certain military functions, such as developing independent intelligence analysis centers. Meanwhile, it may adopt a “NATO+” approach — maintaining NATO’s formal legitimacy while gradually shifting key responsibilities to EU defense institutions.

teleSUR/ JF

Source: Xinhua

EN ESTA NOTA: