On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments over whether former President Donald Trump can legally run for president in November.

RELATED: 

Bolton Obstructed US-Venezuela Relations: President Maduro

This occurred after the Colorado Supreme Court ruled in December that Trump would be kicked off the ballot for engaging in what has been labeled an attempt to overthrow the government on Jan. 6, 2021.

Colorado argued that Trump was in breach of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which prevents anyone who has engaged in “insurrection” from running for public office.

It also contended that his supporters on Jan. 6, at Trump’s behest, tried to prevent Congress from certifying current President Joe Biden’s win, during a protest at the Capitol building.

Trump’s supporters maintain that Jan. 6 was simply a riot, no different from the over 500 riots that occurred in the name of social justice in 2020. They argue that Trump did not direct any of the events that occurred that day and that the charges are an attempt to use the courts for political purposes.

COURT STEERS AWAY FROM KICKING TRUMP OFF BALLOT

The U.S. Supreme Court appeared to steer away from the Colorado decision, with both liberal and conservative judges expressing concern. The justices said Colorado’s decision, if upheld, could have “extraordinary” ramifications.

Chief Justice John Roberts said this would enable a single state to control the entire national election. He added that if Colorado is allowed to bar Trump from the election, it could later backfire on Democrats.

“I would expect that a goodly number of states will say: ‘Whoever the Democratic candidate is, you’re off the ballot.’ That’s a pretty daunting consequence,” he said.

Justice Elena Kagan said allowing a single state to determine the entire presidential election would be extraordinary. “Why should a single state have the ability to make this determination, not only for their own citizens, but for the rest of the nation?” she asked.

Liberal justices also expressed worry over whether kicking Trump off the ballot could have negative consequences. Ketanji Brown Jackson said: “My question is why the framers would have designed a system that would — could — result in interim disuniformity in this way?”

Brookings Institution senior fellow Darrell West said that “several justices expressed doubt about the effort to disqualify Trump from the presidential ballot. They say it sets a precedent of allowing an individual state to outlaw particular candidates. It appears doubtful the Supreme Court will remove Trump from the election.”

IMPACT ON ELECTION

Trump maintains that his detractors will stop at nothing to keep him off the ballot this year. The several court cases filed against him are purely an attempt to prevent him from running, he said.

That narrative plays well with many in Trump’s base, who believe the U.S. political establishment has destroyed their jobs and is trying to destroy their way of life.

Trump’s base views the billionaire businessman as a maverick and a political outsider who backs their values and agrees that Washington elites do not have the best interest of the public in mind.

Christopher Galdieri, a political science professor at Saint Anselm College, said the Supreme Court case may boost Trump’s popularity somewhat among his most dedicated supporters.

West said: “The issue of his qualifications for the job and respect for the law likely will be left to American voters to decide.”

• 
  New York Judge Finds Trump Liable for Fraud
  
• 
  Trump to Turn Himself In for Georgia Election Interference Case
  
• 
  Lawyer Dismisses 2016 Trump-Russia Investigation
  
• 
  Trump in Court for the Second Time, New York
  

EN ESTA NOTA:

Comments

teleSUR comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment *

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Δ